Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
SSM Popul Health ; 23: 101461, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554668

ABSTRACT

Background: We aim to assess the age- and cause-specific contributions to differences in life expectancy and lifespan variation between the high- and low-educated groups in Spain. Methods: We use sex-, age-, education- and cause-specific mortality and population data for individuals aged 30 and over for 2016-19 in Spain. We estimated life expectancies, and standard deviations of the age-at-death distribution (lifespan variation), and we disentangled the contribution of age-causes of death to educational differences in both indicators. Findings: Life expectancy at age 30 was higher for high-educated groups compared to low-educated groups, 5.5 years for males and 3.0 years for females. Lifespan variation was higher for low-educated groups compared to high-educated groups, 2.9 years for males and 2.2 years for females. The main contributors to the life expectancy gaps in males were lung cancer (0.58 years) and ischaemic heart diseases (0.42 years), and in females were other cardiovascular causes (0.26 years), and ischaemic heart diseases (0.22 years). The main contributors to the lifespan variation gaps were in males lung cancer (-0.25 years) and ischaemic heart diseases (-0.22 years), while in females were other neoplasms and other diseases of the nervous system. Interpretation: Whereas behavioural causes are more important in explaining educational inequalities in mortality among men, ageing-related causes of death seem more important among women. Attempts at narrowing socioeconomic gaps in mortality may benefit from applying gender-specific preventive policy measures.

3.
Popul Health Metr ; 20(1): 1, 2022 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34983576

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current measures to monitor population health include indicators of (i) average length-of-life (life expectancy), (ii) average length-of-life spent in good health (health expectancy), and (iii) variability in length-of-life (lifespan inequality). What is lacking is an indicator measuring the extent to which healthy lifespans are unequally distributed across individuals (the so-called 'healthy lifespan inequality' indicators). METHODS: We combine information on age-specific survival with the prevalence of functional limitation or disability in Spain (2014-2017) by sex and level of education to estimate age-at-disability onset distributions. Age-, sex- and education-specific prevalence rates of adult individuals' daily activities limitations were based on the GALI index derived from Spanish National Health Surveys held in 2014 and 2017. We measured inequality using the Gini index. RESULTS: In contemporary Spain, education differences in health expectancy are substantial and greatly exceed differences in life expectancy. The female advantage in life expectancy disappears when considering health expectancy indicators, both overall and across education groups. The highly educated exhibit lower levels of lifespan inequality, and lifespan inequality is systematically higher among men. Our new healthy lifespan inequality indicators suggest that the variability in the ages at which physical daily activity limitations start are substantially larger than the variability in the ages at which individuals die. Healthy lifespan inequality tends to decrease with increasing educational attainment, both for women and for men. The variability in ages at which physical limitations start is slightly higher for women than for men. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested indicators uncover new layers of health inequality that are not traceable with currently existing approaches. Low-educated individuals tend to not only die earlier and spend a shorter portion of their lives in good health than their highly educated counterparts, but also face greater variation in the eventual time of death and in the age at which they cease enjoying good health-a multiple burden of inequality that should be taken into consideration when evaluating the performance of public health systems and in the elaboration of realistic working-life extension plans and the design of equitable pension reforms.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Longevity , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Life Expectancy , Male
5.
Demography ; 55(6): 2045-2070, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324395

ABSTRACT

For a long time, studies of socioeconomic gradients in health have limited their attention to between-group comparisons. Yet, ignoring the differences that might exist within groups and focusing on group-specific life expectancy levels and trends alone, one might arrive at overly simplistic conclusions. Using data from the Spanish Encuesta Sociodemográfica and recently released mortality files by the Spanish Statistical Office (INE), this is the first study to simultaneously document (1) the gradient in life expectancy by educational attainment groups, and (2) the inequality in age-at-death distributions within and across those groups for the period between 1960 and 2015 in Spain. Our findings suggest that life expectancy has been increasing for all education groups but particularly among the highly educated. We observe diverging trends in life expectancy, with the differences between the low- and highly educated becoming increasingly large, particularly among men. Concomitantly with increasing disparities across groups, length-of-life inequality has decreased for the population as a whole and for most education groups, and the contribution of the between-group component of inequality to overall inequality has been extremely small. Even if between-group inequality has increased over time, its contribution has been too small to have sizable effects on overall inequality. In addition, our results suggest that education expansion and declining within-group variability might have been the main drivers of overall lifespan inequality reductions. Nevertheless, the diverging trends in longevity and lifespan inequality across education groups represent an important phenomenon whose underlying causes and potential implications should be investigated in detail.


Subject(s)
Life Expectancy/trends , Longevity , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Rev. esp. geriatr. gerontol. (Ed. impr.) ; 53(2): 66-72, mar.-abr. 2018. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171377

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La creciente participación laboral femenina compromete el actual modelo de cuidado a los mayores. El objetivo es conocer la evolución del perfil sociodemográfico de los cuidadores informales de los mayores con discapacidad, la interacción entre empleo y cuidado y la opinión de la ciudadanía sobre la responsabilidad de ese cuidado. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal de las encuestas de ámbito nacional de discapacidad realizadas en 1999 (n=3.936) y en 2008 (n=5.257), la de salud de 2011-2012 (n=439) y la de familia y género de 2012 (n=1.359). Se analizaron mediante tablas de contingencia en función del sexo y la edad. Resultados. La mitad de los cuidadores estudiados son mujeres de 45 a 64 años. Entre 1999 y 2011-2012 se concentraron cada vez más en las edades 55 a 64, entre las que se dobló la participación laboral del 20% al 40%. El aumento de los cuidadores masculinos estuvo asociado al desempleo. El trabajo de cuidado repercutió negativamente en la vida laboral, con mayor impacto entre las mujeres y entre los cuidadores de mayores con discapacidad severa. Los menos proclives a que el cuidado a los mayores se fundamentara en la familia fueron las mujeres de 45 a 54 años activas (solo el 42%) o más instruidas (40%), frente al 60% de las inactivas y el 55% de las menos formadas. Conclusiones. Las mujeres activas e instruidas son menos proclives al cuidado fundamentado en la familia, pero lo asumen independientemente de su actividad, mientras que los varones lo hacen según su disponibilidad (AU)


Introduction. The increasing participation of women in the workforce may make it difficult to sustain the current model of elderly care. The aim of this article was to determine the changing sociodemographic profile of informal elderly caregivers with disabilities, the interaction between employment and care, and the view of the public on the responsibility of that care. Materials and methods. Cross-sectional analysis of secondary data from four national surveys were used: the disability surveys held in 1999 (N=3,936) and 2008 (N=5,257), the 2011-12 National Health Survey (N=439), and the Family and Gender survey of 2012 (N=1,359). They were analysed using contingency tables based on gender and age. Results. Half of the informal caregivers were women aged 45 to 64 years. Between 1999 and 2011-12 they became more concentrated in the 55-64 age-bracket, among whom participation in the workforce doubled from 20% to 40%. Increased care for men was associated with unemployment. Care work had a negative impact on working life, with greater impact among women and those who cared for elderly people with severe disabilities. Less likely to consider that elderly care provision should rest on family are 45-54 year-old economically active women (only 42%) or those who are more educated (40%), compared to 60% of economically inactive women and 55% of less educated women. Conclusions. Economically active and educated women are less inclined to family-based care, but assume it independently of their workforce participation, whereas males do so according to their availability (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Caregivers/trends , Home Nursing/trends , Frail Elderly , Disabled Persons , Homebound Persons , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data
7.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 53(2): 66-72, 2018.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29217329

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The increasing participation of women in the workforce may make it difficult to sustain the current model of elderly care. The aim of this article was to determine the changing sociodemographic profile of informal elderly caregivers with disabilities, the interaction between employment and care, and the view of the public on the responsibility of that care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of secondary data from four national surveys were used: the disability surveys held in 1999 (N=3,936) and 2008 (N=5,257), the 2011-12 National Health Survey (N=439), and the Family and Gender survey of 2012 (N=1,359). They were analysed using contingency tables based on gender and age. RESULTS: Half of the informal caregivers were women aged 45 to 64 years. Between 1999 and 2011-12 they became more concentrated in the 55-64 age-bracket, among whom participation in the workforce doubled from 20% to 40%. Increased care for men was associated with unemployment. Care work had a negative impact on working life, with greater impact among women and those who cared for elderly people with severe disabilities. Less likely to consider that elderly care provision should rest on family are 45-54 year-old economically active women (only 42%) or those who are more educated (40%), compared to 60% of economically inactive women and 55% of less educated women. CONCLUSIONS: Economically active and educated women are less inclined to family-based care, but assume it independently of their workforce participation, whereas males do so according to their availability.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Persons , Family Characteristics , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Sex Distribution , Sociological Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Econ Hum Biol ; 10(3): 276-88, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21924964

ABSTRACT

This paper seeks new insights concerning the health transition in 20th century Spain by analyzing both traditional (mortality-based) and alternative (anthropometric-based) health indicators. Data were drawn from national censuses, vital and cause-of-death statistics and seven National Health Surveys dating from 1987 to 2006 (almost 100,000 subjects aged 20-79 were used to compute cohort height averages). A multivariate regression analysis was performed on infant mortality and economic/historical dummy variables. Our results agree with the general timing of the health transition process in Spain as has been described to date insofar as we document that there was a rapid improvement of sanitary and health care related factors during the second half of the 20th century reflected by a steady decline in infant mortality and increase in adult height. However, the association between adult height and infant mortality turned out to be not linear. In addition, remarkable gender differences emerged: mean height increased continuously for male cohorts born after 1940 but meaningful improvements in height among female cohorts was not attained until the late 1950s.


Subject(s)
Body Height/physiology , Income/statistics & numerical data , Infant Mortality/trends , Life Expectancy/trends , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , Female , Health Surveys , Health Transition , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Self Report , Spain , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...